Semburan anti-denggi

Apabila sesuatu perkara berlaku, maka wujudlah komen-komen yang sangat2 membina daripada beberapa pihak. Namun tahukah kita bahawa beberapa aspek keselamatan tidak diambilkira sewaktu operasi semburan nyamuk ini dilaksanakan.

Jabatan Kesihatan Daerah yang bertanggungjawab terhadap operasi menyembur semburan anti-dengi tidak memaklumkan pemberitahuan yang secukupnya kepada orangramai atau penghuni rumah-rumah dikawasan yang terbabit dalam operasi penyemburan semburan anti-dengi ini.

Biasanya operasi penyemburan ini dilakukan pada waktu senja. Terdapat seorang dua pegawai Jabatan Kesihatan yang berkunjung ke setiap rumah memaklumkan operasi di jalankan. Sekadar meminta penghuni mengosongkan rumah masing-masing, operasi ini kemudiannya bermula.

Malah ada pertugas penyembur yang tidak menggunakan alat perlindungan diri secukupnya. Hanya sekadar penutup mulut kertas ataupun dari jenis penapis (respirator) yang nampak sangat katrij yang digunakan sudah lama tidak bertukar. Ramai di antara mereka ini mengabaikan penggunaan sarung tangan dan pemakaian alas baju (apron) dan sebagainya.

Kebanyakan penghuni pula terutama kanak-kanak akan menjadikan operasi ini sebagai suatu pesta. Orang dewasa akan berkumpul hanya beberapa meter di hadapan rumah dan membiarkan kanak-kanak berkeliaran sesama usia.

Begitu juga seperti yang dialami oleh unit OSHE PPSB didalam melaksanakan tugasan penyemburan anti-denggi ini. Kebanyakkan kakitangan enggan meninggalkan tempat kerja masing-masing seolah-olah tidak menyedari bahaya daripada terhidu asap semburan ini. Mungkin ramai beranggapan asap tersebut hanya mampu membunuh nyamuk tetapi tidak kepada manusia.

Semoga kejadian ini menjadi teladan kepada semua pihak sama ada dari pihak berkuasa ataupun orang ramai. Jika masih diabaikan juga, tidak mustahil suatu hari kelak akan kedengaran laporan orang ramai yang maut bukan kerana dengi tetapi akibat terhidu asap beracun semburan anti-dengi ini.


The Star 13-Nov-2007

19 schoolgirls vomit during fogging operation

ALOR STAR: Nineteen schoolgirls got nauseous and started vomiting when they inhaled smoke from anti-dengue fogging at their hostel here.

The Sekolah Darul Ulum Ihya Ulumuddin students, aged between 12 and 17, were in their hostel in Lorong Datuk Keramat here when the incident occurred about 6.45pm.

Kedah Health Department director Dr Hasnah Ismail said that the students were among more than 300 who were asked to wait at their hostel compound during the fogging operation.

However, Dr Hasnah said a sudden change in wind direction caused smoke from fogging in the hostel rooms to move towards the girls who were standing in the middle of the compound, causing some of them to inhale the thick smoke.

Dr Hasnah said that the girls received outpatient treatment at the hospital and were allowed to return to their hostel at about 11pm the same day.

The Star 7-Nov-2007

Chua: Rise in dengue cases but situation under control

At The Dewan Rakyat
Reports by LEE YUK PENG AND FLORENCE A. SAMY

DENGUE cases increased by 47.5% for the first eight months of this year compared to the same period last year, said Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek.

“Until Aug 18, the number of reported cases stood at 33,207 compared to 22,511 for the same period last year. Although the cases have increased, the situation is still under control and it is not at the panic stage,” he said in a written reply to M. Kulasegaran (DAP - Ipoh Barat).

He said 74 deaths had been reported during the period compared to 59 for the same period last year.

“The fatality rate is still low at 0.2%. However, it can increase between 40% and 50% if treatment is not administered effectively,” he added.
Unplanned urbanisation and lack of cooperation from society in eradicating aedes breeding grounds had attributed to the increase in dengue cases in the region, he said.

“Our ministry study showed that residential homes still had the most breeding grounds. From Aug 12 until 18 this year, 621 of 713 premises which tested positive for aedes breeding were residential homes,” he added.

Samy shocked, wants answers

Samy shocked, wants answers

The collapsed structure – the first of a two-phase project under the Perak State Park Corporation – consisted of 14 rooms, an office block, a showroom to sell orang asli goods, and a car park. Completed in 2004, it was built at a cost of RM4.5mil with an allocation from the Tourism Ministry.
The second phase consists of 26 more rooms at the same site; the project costing RM5mil is also funded by the Tourism Ministry.
Samy Vellu said the project was not under Public Works Department (PWD) supervision, but since PWD is the technical arm of the Government, he has ordered the Perak PWD to conduct an investigation.
Perak PWD director Datuk Wong Wai Ching, who is leading the investigation team, said the probe would cover various aspects, including a landslide, which apparently occurred behind the collapsed building.
“I have directed Wong to submit the report to me so that I can brief the Cabinet and the Perak Government,” said Samy Vellu.
Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Mohamad Tajol Rosli Ghazali said the Perak State Park Corporation informed the state government about two to three weeks ago that the building was unstable, after which the PWD was called in.

Bangunan PTNP Tasik Banding runtuh
Utusan Malaysia 14-Nov-2007
GERIK 13 Nov. – Sebuah bangunan dua tingkat milik Perbadanan Taman Negeri Perak (PTNP) yang sudah hampir siap di Tasik Banding di sini, runtuh sama sekali dipercayai akibat kerosakan pada struktur.
Yang menjadi persoalan ialah bagaimana bangunan yang sepatutnya menjadi pusat pentadbiran Taman Negeri Royal Belum dan dibina dengan kos jutaan ringgit itu boleh runtuh sekelip mata.
Ia seolah-olah menggambarkan pembinaannya yang terletak di lereng Tasik Banding itu tidak dipantau dengan betul dan tidak memenuhi spesifikasi yang ditetapkan.
Menurut saksi, separuh daripada struktur bangunan yang dibina sejak empat tahun lalu itu runtuh pada pukul 8 pagi ini dan ranap sepenuhnya kira-kira pukul 10 pagi.
Namun, tiada kemalangan jiwa dilaporkan berlaku dalam kejadian runtuhan bangunan yang belum diduduki itu.
Tinjauan Utusan Malaysia mendapati, di samping bangunan yang runtuh itu, terdapat juga kejadian tanah runtuh di bahagian belakang bangunan yang dibina di lereng Tasik Banding tersebut.
Bangunan tersebut dipercayai dibina oleh kontraktor swasta.
Seorang penduduk yang juga saksi kejadian, Bileh Jalil, 18, berkata, beliau menyedari bangunan itu runtuh kira-kira pukul 8 pagi setelah terdengar bunyi yang kuat dari kawasan berkenaan.
Katanya, semasa kejadian beliau berada di sebuah gerai berhampiran jeti yang digunakan untuk berulang-alik ke sekitar pulau-pulau di Tasik Banding.
Menurutnya, selang dua jam kemudian satu lagi runtuhan berlaku, iaitu kira-kira pukul 10 pagi yang sekali gus meranapkan keseluruhan struktur bangunan berkenaan.
“Saya tidak sangka bangunan itu runtuh sama sekali kerana tiada kejadian hujan lebat berlaku semalam dan air di kawasan berkenaan sudah surut,” katanya ketika ditemui di tempat kejadian di sini, hari ini.
Katanya, semasa kejadian lima orang pekerja termasuk dua Orang Asli sedang menyiapkan kerja-kerja di kawasan bangunan berkenaan.
“Saya percaya tiada kemalangan jiwa berlaku di kawasan runtuhan tersebut kerana mereka bekerja di luar kawasan kemalangan,” katanya.
Sementara itu, Ketua Polis Hulu Perak, Supritendan Maahad Mohd. Nor ketika dihubungi berkata, polis sehingga kini belum menerima laporan berhubung kejadian itu.

Bangunan PTNP runtuh: Perunding dan kontraktor turut disiasat
Utusan Malaysia / 14.11.07
IPOH 14 Nov — Satu badan profesional akan menjalankan siasatan termasuk terhadap perunding dan kontraktor berhubung kejadian runtuhan bangunan Perbadanan Taman Negeri Perak (PTNP) di lereng Tasik Banding di Gerik semalam.
Menteri Besar, Datuk Seri Tajol Rosli Ghazali berkata, badan profesional itu akan dilantik selepas selesai perbincangan dengan Jabatan Kerja Raya yang akan memberi panduan dan nasihat kepada kerajaan negeri.
“Kejadian itu sebenarnya berlaku sedikit demi sedikit (dan) menurut pegawai PTNP, JKR telah siasat dan telah melakukan kerja pengukuhan supaya bangunan ini tidak runtuh selepas PTNP mendapati ada berlakunya kecondongan tanah dalam tempoh dua dan tiga minggu lepas,” katanya kepada pemberita selepas mempengerusikan mesyuarat mingguan exco kerajaan negeri di sini hari ini.
Beliau berkata, berdasarkan laporan awal JKR yang membuat pemeriksaan ke tapak lawatan, kejadian itu mungkin disebabkan terdapatnya satu atau dua cerucuk atau tiang yang lemah sehingga ia tidak boleh menampung struktur bangunan yang pembinaan fasa pertamanya mendapat peruntukan RM4.5 juta daripada Kementerian Pelancongan.
“Cerucuk atau tiang-tiang lain pula tidak dapat menampung beban yang semakin bertambah,” katanya.
Beliau berkata, berdasarkan laporan awal JKR juga, tiang atau cerucuk yang lemah itu mungkin disebabkan oleh ketidaksesuaian reka bentuk, bahan binaan, kerja pembinaan serta kualiti.
Bangunan itu, yang menempatkan ruang pejabat, bilik pameran jualan, bilik penginapan serta tempat letak kereta, merupakan satu projek bagi menyediakan kemudahan transit kepada pelancong yang ingin meneroka keindahan alam semula jadi dalam kawasan Taman Negeri Royal Belum.
Semua operasi PTNP di pejabatnya yang terletak di Gerik belum berpindah ke kawasan baru itu kerana bangunan berkenaan belum diserahkan kepada perbadanan itu.
“Fasa pertama telah siap manakala fasa kedua tidak dijalankan lagi kerana ada penambahan bilik sehingga 26 dan 28 bilik seperti dicadangkan dan menjadi faktor kelewatan. Ini kerana jika lebih 28 bilik, ada cukai yang perlu dibayar,” katanya.
Anggota Dewan Undangan Negeri Temenggor, Datuk Hasbullah Othman berkata, sebahagian bangunan itu dipercayai runtuh pada 8 pagi sebelum ranap terus kira-kira dua jam kemudian.
“Kita bersyukur kerana kejadian itu tidak membabitkan kehilangan nyawa,” katanya kepada pemberita selepas meninjau kawasan berkenaan.
Tapak bangunan yang menjadi pintu masuk ke Taman Negeri Royal Belum itu terletak di sebuah cerun bukit di tebing Tasik Temenggor.
Badan Pencegah Rasuah (BPR) Perak telah menubuhkan pasukan khas bagi menyiasat kejadian itu, kata pengarahnya Samsiah Abu Bakar.
“Kita akan menyiasat dan mengenal pasti jika terdapat sebarang aspek kesalahan atau penyelewengan dalam projek berkenaan,” katanya ketika dihubungi hari ini.
Samsiah berkata, BPR akan bekerjasama dengan JKR untuk menyiasat setiap aspek bagi mengenal pasti punca kejadian sebelum tindakan diambil.- Bernama

Words From DG DOSH/JKKP

“Worker safety is always first”

With the growing number of development projects in the country, workers’ safety has become a major concern. PATRICK SENNYAH speaks to newly appointed Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) director-general Datuk Ir Dr Johari Basri on the situation in Malaysia

Q: How would you describe the overall health and safety situation of our workers?
A: With the increase in economic activities like construction, manufacturing and plantation, there would be an upward trend in accident rates, especially at construction sites. This is a normal scenario and we have taken steps to ensure that the accident rate does not increase.
Prevention is our main focus. We do not want to wait for an accident to happen and then proceed with enforcement. We want to make sure that enforcement is strictly carried out and all necessary steps are taken by employers to prevent mishaps.
Q: What is the main cause of industrial accidents?

A: They mostly result from poor training. That is why, nowadays, we want to ensure that workers are given adequate training. If not, we will take the necessary action.
Sometimes, employers fail to practise safe working procedures. For example, there are insufficient safety guidelines for operators of cranes or heavy machinery. This is where we ensure that all workers clearly understand these procedures and know how to operate the machines safely.
Also, under the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994, employers are required to carry out a risk assessment to identify the type of risk associated with a particular type of work. For example, before construction work begins, the employer must assess the risks involved and ensure all guidelines under the Hazard Identification Risk Assessment and Risk Control are followed. It is better for the risks to be identified and eliminated before work starts.
Q: What is the most common industrial accident?
A: Workers falling off buildings under construction. That is why employers must ensure that their workers always follow safe work procedures and use the proper personal protective equipment. At any worksite, there must be an OSH (Occupational Safety and Health) management system.
By adopting an OSH system, employers will be able to better manage the risks at their worksites. They can do this by assessing, identifying and controlling the risk.
In fact, I am also the executive director of Asean-OSHNET (Asean Occupational Safety and Health Network), where the 10 Asean countries collaborate on training, research, consultancy, standards and safety.
This is basically an effort by Asean governments to enhance safety and health in their respective countries. This networking allows us to exchange information and share our experience.
Certain training procedures used in Malaysia have been offered to other Asean nations, such as our safety and health officers course, forklift safety training and individual hygiene monitoring.
Q: Does the development of new technologies bring new threats to workers’ safety?A: Definitely, which is why those in DOSH have to be in touch with the latest developments. Our officers undergo continuous training, especially in the petrochemical industry.
This industry is always pushing the limits of production by increasing the capacity of the system in terms of pressure and temperature. This put the system at high risk, which must be matched with proper safety measures.

In order to be able to carry out enforcement on this type of high- technology industry, we have to enhance our knowledge so that we are able to assess whether the system is adequate to prevent accidents like leaks of flammable material.
Q: How would you describe the competency level of our DOSH officers?A: In developed countries, officers must be one step ahead and be able to identify emerging risks. For a significant risk to be identified, we must carry out certain studies, assessments and clinical testing. We must be able to identify risks that are sometimes considered minor by others.
To do this, our learning process is never-ending. For example, in ergonomics (the study of workplace design and the physical and psychological impact it has on workers), even the prolonged use of a computer keyboard, poorly designed chairs or workstations could lead to health problems. There’s much development in this area and we must understand it to be able to carry out enforcement.
This problem of ensuring proper ergonomics is now surfacing in Malaysia and we must be prepared for it. The scope of our activities are very wide and our inspectors must be given continuous training and be on their toes at all times.
Q: What about the OSH practitioners?
A: These practitioners must upgrade themselves and stay in touch with the changing business climate. Before they are assigned to provide a certain kind of service, DOSH will make sure that they have the desired expertise.
We don’t want OSH practitioners to call themselves consultants and advise employers after attending a two-day course. Sometimes, when an employer has no knowledge of a certain issue, he would turn to these so-called consultants who themselves sometimes have little or no knowledge about the issue. In the end, the employer is shortchanged and workers are at risk.
It is our aim to develop a culture where OSH is given priority even before work starts. Achieving a zero accident rate is about co-ordinating efforts to increase aware-ness on the importance of work safety. We want to develop a preventive culture which will become the cornerstone of all worksites in future. There is no point talking about it after a life is lost.
Q: Coming back to the issue of ergonomics, how prevalent is this in Malaysia?
A: There is a division under the DOSH to monitor this. Let’s say a baggage handler lifts more than a hundred bags for more than eight hours a day. There is a possibility he may suffer from back problems. So, we do an assessment of his activities and interview the worker with the help of our doctors.
The doctor will make an assessment on whether the back problem is caused by his job or it is an inherent problem unrelated to his work. If work-related, the doctor will make a recommendation on the necessary course of action to be taken, which may include reducing the workload or the working hours.
Q: What is the progress of the forensic unit under DOSH?
A: The unit was set up this month and consists of experienced staff to carry out detailed investigations when accidents such as exposure to chemicals, failure of structures or toppling of cranes happen.
They will collect evidence, conduct analysis, lab tests and piece the evidence together to find out the cause of the accident. They will then compile a report and decide if there is a need to prosecute.
If necessary, they will also give evidence in court. We have staffed the unit with our best inspectors, including those from the states.
Q: What is your idea of a decent workplace?
A: A workplace that provides workers with adequate rewards and compensation in a healthy and safe environment. Workers’ rights must be protected and there should be no discrimination in terms of age, race or gender.
Workers must also be given protection, such as insurance, and must not be exploited. OSH is, of course, an important ingredient of a decent workplace.
Q: What about maintenance? Is this an important aspect as well?
A: Of course. A maintenance culture is very important. When something is new, it is fine but when it gets old, safety becomes an issue and we must have maintenance. For example, if a plane is not maintained, there is a high chance that it will crash. The same applies to all machinery. Sometimes, proper maintenance is the difference between life and death.